↓ Skip to main content

An integrated approach for genome annotation of the eukaryotic thermophile Chaetomium thermophilum

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An integrated approach for genome annotation of the eukaryotic thermophile Chaetomium thermophilum
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1093/nar/gku1147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Bock, Wei-Hua Chen, Alessandro Ori, Nayab Malik, Noella Silva-Martin, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Sean T. Powell, Panagiotis L. Kastritis, Georgy Smyshlyaev, Ivana Vonkova, Joanna Kirkpatrick, Tobias Doerks, Leo Nesme, Jochen Baßler, Martin Kos, Ed Hurt, Teresa Carlomagno, Anne-Claude Gavin, Orsolya Barabas, Christoph W. Müller, Vera van Noort, Martin Beck, Peer Bork

Abstract

The thermophilic fungus Chaetomium thermophilum holds great promise for structural biology. To increase the efficiency of its biochemical and structural characterization and to explore its thermophilic properties beyond those of individual proteins, we obtained transcriptomics and proteomics data, and integrated them with computational annotation methods and a multitude of biochemical experiments conducted by the structural biology community. We considerably improved the genome annotation of Chaetomium thermophilum and characterized the transcripts and expression of thousands of genes. We furthermore show that the composition and structure of the expressed proteome of Chaetomium thermophilum is similar to its mesophilic relatives. Data were deposited in a publicly available repository and provide a rich source to the structural biology community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 36%
Computer Science 5 4%
Chemistry 4 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 18 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,238,302
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#10,829
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,996
of 269,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#133
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.