↓ Skip to main content

PhylomeDB v3.0: an expanding repository of genome-wide collections of trees, alignments and phylogeny-based orthology and paralogy predictions

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PhylomeDB v3.0: an expanding repository of genome-wide collections of trees, alignments and phylogeny-based orthology and paralogy predictions
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2010
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkq1109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Salvador Capella-Gutierrez, Leszek P. Pryszcz, Ivan Denisov, Diego Kormes, Marina Marcet-Houben, Toni Gabaldón

Abstract

The growing availability of complete genomic sequences from diverse species has brought about the need to scale up phylogenomic analyses, including the reconstruction of large collections of phylogenetic trees. Here, we present the third version of PhylomeDB (http://phylomeDB.org), a public database for genome-wide collections of gene phylogenies (phylomes). Currently, PhylomeDB is the largest phylogenetic repository and hosts 17 phylomes, comprising 416,093 trees and 165,840 alignments. It is also a major source for phylogeny-based orthology and paralogy predictions, covering about 5 million proteins in 717 fully-sequenced genomes. For each protein-coding gene in a seed genome, the database provides original and processed alignments, phylogenetic trees derived from various methods and phylogeny-based predictions of orthology and paralogy relationships. The new version of phylomeDB has been extended with novel data access and visualization features, including the possibility of programmatic access. Available seed species include model organisms such as human, yeast, Escherichia coli or Arabidopsis thaliana, but also alternative model species such as the human pathogen Candida albicans, or the pea aphid Acyrtosiphon pisum. Finally, PhylomeDB is currently being used by several genome sequencing projects that couple the genome annotation process with the reconstruction of the corresponding phylome, a strategy that provides relevant evolutionary insights.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 8 4%
Germany 3 2%
France 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 157 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 23%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Professor 12 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 13 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 16%
Computer Science 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 14 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#12,416
of 26,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,068
of 100,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#106
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.