You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interoperability with Moby 1.0—It's better than sharing your toothbrush!
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Briefings in Bioinformatics, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1093/bib/bbn003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark D Wilkinson, Martin Senger, Edward Kawas, Richard Bruskiewich, Jerome Gouzy, Celine Noirot, Philippe Bardou, Ambrose Ng, Dirk Haase, Enrique de Andres Saiz, Dennis Wang, Frank Gibbons, Paul M K Gordon, Christoph W Sensen, Jose Manuel Rodriguez Carrasco, José M Fernández, Lixin Shen, Matthew Links, Michael Ng, Nina Opushneva, Pieter B T Neerincx, Jack A M Leunissen, Rebecca Ernst, Simon Twigger, Bjorn Usadel, Benjamin Good, Yan Wong, Lincoln Stein, William Crosby, Johan Karlsson, Romina Royo, Iván Párraga, Sergio Ramírez, Josep Lluis Gelpi, Oswaldo Trelles, David G Pisano, Natalia Jimenez, Arnaud Kerhornou, Roman Rosset, Leire Zamacola, Joaquin Tarraga, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Jose María Carazo, Joaquin Dopazo, Roderic Guigo, Arcadi Navarro, Modesto Orozco, Alfonso Valencia, M Gonzalo Claros, Antonio J Pérez, Jose Aldana, M Mar Rojano, Raul Fernandez-Santa Cruz, Ismael Navas, Gary Schiltz, Andrew Farmer, Damian Gessler, Heiko Schoof, Andreas Groscurth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Iceland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 72 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Professor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 42% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,437,473
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Briefings in Bioinformatics
#1,355
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,077
of 156,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Briefings in Bioinformatics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.