You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient expectations in placebo‐controlled randomized clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00512.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A. Stone, Catherine E. Kerr, Eric Jacobson, Lisa A. Conboy ScD, Ted J. Kaptchuk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 32% |
| Psychology | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,369,647
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#307
of 1,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,592
of 153,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them