↓ Skip to main content

Culture and Testing Practices: Is the World Flat?

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychology: An International Review, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Culture and Testing Practices: Is the World Flat?
Published in
Applied Psychology: An International Review, March 2017
DOI 10.1111/apps.12095
Authors

Ann Marie Ryan, Matthew C. Reeder, Juliya Golubovich, James Grand, Ilke Inceoglu, Dave Bartram, Eva Derous, Ioannis Nikolaou, Xiang Yao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 20%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,314,251
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychology: An International Review
#157
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,856
of 321,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychology: An International Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.