↓ Skip to main content

Destructive De-Energizing Relationships: How Thriving Buffers Their Effect on Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Destructive De-Energizing Relationships: How Thriving Buffers Their Effect on Performance
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, September 2015
DOI 10.1037/apl0000015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Gerbasi, Christine L. Porath, Andrew Parker, Gretchen Spreitzer, Rob Cross

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 188 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 13%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Professor 9 5%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 69 35%
Psychology 37 19%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 46 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,094,712
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#378
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,702
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.