You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional leadership in interteam contexts: Understanding ‘what’ in the context of why? where? when? and who?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Leadership Quarterly, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101378 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorothy R Carter, Kristin L Cullen-Lester, Justin M Jones, Alexandra Gerbasi, Donna Chrobot-Mason, Eun Young Nae |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 19% |
| Unknown | 81 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 70 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 10% |
| Psychology | 23 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,384,214
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Leadership Quarterly
#521
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,658
of 482,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leadership Quarterly
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.