RT @HengartnerMP: This is why Jefferson and Jorgensen argued that we need to redifine the E in Evidence Based Medicine https://t.co/4jqXHr…
RT @HengartnerMP: This is why Jefferson and Jorgensen argued that we need to redifine the E in Evidence Based Medicine https://t.co/4jqXHr…
"Clinical study reports...more often lay bare the shabby way in which we currently analyse harms. So, should we ignore evidence from journal articles? If steps are not taken urgently to address the situation, then ‘probably’ would be our answer." https://t
RT @HengartnerMP: This is why Jefferson and Jorgensen argued that we need to redifine the E in Evidence Based Medicine https://t.co/4jqXHr…
Each time I remember the proportion of completed unpublished studies (of those listed on regulatory/industry trial registers), the more I agree that Ethics is quite different from Evidence in the E paradigm of EBM. https://t.co/CLrq9T1VwR
RT @HengartnerMP: This is why Jefferson and Jorgensen argued that we need to redifine the E in Evidence Based Medicine https://t.co/4jqXHr…
This is why Jefferson and Jorgensen argued that we need to redifine the E in Evidence Based Medicine https://t.co/4jqXHrk7pV
RT @CochraneUK: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM". A thought-provoking read: https://t.co/ElB2O2INSg
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
Medical librarianship is cheerfully teaching first-year students about the evidence pyramid and Cochrane systematic reviews, and then going back to your desk and processing this reality
RT @carmendiri: Tanto la ética como la evidencia comienzan con 'E'. En 'Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM' https://t.co/2zvdk8MJGr
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
Tanto la ética como la evidencia comienzan con 'E'. En 'Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM' https://t.co/2zvdk8MJGr
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @albertogimenoPC: https://t.co/OsbGnO9yOV Sobre ética y el agotamiento del paradigma de la Medicina Basada en la Evidencia (hay una vers…
https://t.co/OsbGnO9yOV Sobre ética y el agotamiento del paradigma de la Medicina Basada en la Evidencia (hay una versión en español, el enlace está al final del artículo).
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
RT @JReynoldsMLIS: One key point - "Garbage, however, is often neutral, but some articles are not neutral. They can be carefully contrived…
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
@Petrax19 ¡Gracias! Lo difundí en su día. Hay traducción al español https://t.co/6WPvD5E9HZ
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
One key point - "Garbage, however, is often neutral, but some articles are not neutral. They can be carefully contrived pieces of marketing"
RT @KSRInfoTeam: The same applies to developing a search from a poorly defined research question: rubbish research question = rubbish searc…
RT @KSRInfoTeam: The same applies to developing a search from a poorly defined research question: rubbish research question = rubbish searc…
RT @KSRInfoTeam: The same applies to developing a search from a poorly defined research question: rubbish research question = rubbish searc…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @LuisCLCorreia: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM @EMBLive2019 by Tom Jefferson. Our reliance on journal articles needs a redefinition, if not a…
RT @Petrax19: La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones s…
RT @LuisCLCorreia: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM @EMBLive2019 by Tom Jefferson. Our reliance on journal articles needs a redefinition, if not a…
La "E" de EBM debe estar incluida en transparEncia. Una Evidencia sin Ética puede convertirse en basura. Si las revisiones se basan en esto se alejan de la verdad. Necesitamos acceso a datos en bruto. Cambio de paradigma.Editorial interesante @JuanGrvas
RT @KSRInfoTeam: The same applies to developing a search from a poorly defined research question: rubbish research question = rubbish searc…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
The same applies to developing a search from a poorly defined research question: rubbish research question = rubbish search. No matter how complex or sophisticated the search is, it cannot fix a poorly thought out res question #systematicsearching #systema
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
@chiara_arienti
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @LuisCLCorreia: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM @EMBLive2019 by Tom Jefferson. Our reliance on journal articles needs a redefinition, if not a…
RT @LuisCLCorreia: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM @EMBLive2019 by Tom Jefferson. Our reliance on journal articles needs a redefinition, if not a…
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM @EMBLive2019 by Tom Jefferson. Our reliance on journal articles needs a redefinition, if not a shift. For every page of journal article, there may be up to 8000 pages of regulatory data on the same clinical trial. https://t.co/Cwx
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
Cochrane has a history of publishing garbage reviews that the editor in chief knows are heavily flawed but still allows to stand. This leads to harm of patients. Perhaps Cochrane should clean up their own act before preaching to others.
#EBMLive2019 Parallel Session 15:30 Redefining the E in EBM - Tom Jefferson https://t.co/r1S10IKEwn
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @CochraneUK: "Garbage In = Garbage Out. Whatever is produced in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage".…
RT @docmundele: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/Fr5WFkNJT5
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/Fr5WFkNJT5
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM. Redefiniendo la “E” de MBE. Free access to the English and Spanish versions. There is a Spanish language translation of this article available as a data supplement. Versión en español, como material suplementario. https://t.co/
RT @nogracias_eu: @waltzing_piglet Esto no es un combate de boxeo... la MBE https://t.co/gh0TwMoMCA y los estándares regulatorios https://…
@waltzing_piglet Esto no es un combate de boxeo... la MBE https://t.co/gh0TwMoMCA y los estándares regulatorios https://t.co/f6jOZJz6zt han sido debilitados por los intereses económicos y la política pro-business. No es antiVPH sino anti mala ciencia http
@PaulMor64695904 @benzosarebad @andreas_omh @phrenohead @SameiHuda @LinnyJackson @champs_champs @NoMoreStigmaMH @dawso007 @LeighFanner @sameerjauhar Thats rich coming from you, given your repeated putdowns & condescension during this 'discussion'. Abou
RT @CochraneUK: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM". A thought-provoking read: https://t.co/ElB2O2INSg
RT @docdu16: Redefining the 'E' in EBM by Jefferson and Jorgensen (article d'avril 2018). https://t.co/OKdRtGkmVA
Redefining the 'E' in EBM by Jefferson and Jorgensen (article d'avril 2018). https://t.co/OKdRtGkmVA
@DrMarkMurphy @NourishUnow @ciarakellydoc @DrRobertOConnor @drg1985 Reliability of medical 'evidence base': https://t.co/emZZQPU3k8; https://t.co/PSf2YNBIwd; https://t.co/rdvcZdIg8b; 3rd leading cause of death-medically-induced https://t.co/PBkMHGmhg6 pe
RT @AbelNovoa: @Elmeridlpqatrfv @apetp_ @CanepaOneto @aeac_science Hay que redefinir la e de evidencia https://t.co/E3QVcg68T1
@Elmeridlpqatrfv @apetp_ @CanepaOneto @aeac_science Hay que redefinir la e de evidencia https://t.co/E3QVcg68T1
Tom Jefferson on SR "of studies which are biased and in some cases ghost written or cherry picked and not taking that into account in the review, then its garbage in and garbage out– its just that the ‘garbage out’ has a nice little Cochrane logo on it” h
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our two FREE papers @BMJ_EBM: 1) "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM": https://t.co/pzOHrcDBe5 2) "The Cochrane #H…
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/7lwoI2fWQb
RT @joelving: Losing @cochranecollab would be a major blow to science & public health. Instead of using recent criticism (eg https://t.co/O…
I obvs don't have the answer to the specific dispute, but the overall methodological issues re: syst revs raised by @LarsJorgensenMD, @PGtzsche1 & Jefferson in https://t.co/Fwn6ayscxb and https://t.co/Mv4Z2PZZs2 are really important to address, I think
RT @joelving: Losing @cochranecollab would be a major blow to science & public health. Instead of using recent criticism (eg https://t.co/O…
RT @joelving: Losing @cochranecollab would be a major blow to science & public health. Instead of using recent criticism (eg https://t.co/O…
RT @joelving: Losing @cochranecollab would be a major blow to science & public health. Instead of using recent criticism (eg https://t.co/O…
Losing @cochranecollab would be a major blow to science & public health. Instead of using recent criticism (eg https://t.co/ODyG5moP6d) as a stepping stone to scientific growth, the org seems to have chosen censorship & exclusion. Very sad news ind
“Redefining the E in EBM” https://t.co/GgLkwah1JR
RT @RxISK: A warning from 2 Cochrane Center reviewers about the future of Evidence-Based Medicine: “By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, w…
RT @matt_westmore: Reliance on journal articles needs rethink. 1st problem is compression factor. For every page of journal article 8000 pa…
RT @tripdatabase: Great your highlighting this! Need to facilitate use of the extra data - make it machine readable at the very least https…
RT @tripdatabase: Great your highlighting this! Need to facilitate use of the extra data - make it machine readable at the very least https…
Great your highlighting this! Need to facilitate use of the extra data - make it machine readable at the very least
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/kdsuifEou2
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/kdsuifEou2
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/kdsuifEou2
@hipsterlife85 @BobVermeeren @function2fitnes @ShoulderGeek1 This just out may be of interest https://t.co/6O0IHoBPIV
RT @BJSM_BMJ: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/kdsuifEou2
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/kdsuifEou2
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
RT @eturnermd1: Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the c…
Exactly! As an FDA reviewer, I was struck with how a clinical study report would go on for several hundred pages, yet the corresponding journal article would be just a handful of pages, highly selected sound bites. @RIATinitiative
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our two FREE papers @BMJ_EBM: 1) "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM": https://t.co/pzOHrcDBe5 2) "The Cochrane #H…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our two FREE papers @BMJ_EBM: 1) "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM": https://t.co/pzOHrcDBe5 2) "The Cochrane #H…
RT @HengartnerMP: @WeCareAboutMH A radical solution would be to base meta-analyses on other data sources. There have been several calls tha…
@WeCareAboutMH A radical solution would be to base meta-analyses on other data sources. There have been several calls that journal articles should not form the evidence base any longer. Instead of published papers we could focus on regulatory data (https:/