| Title |
2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.100771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra Papaioannou, Suzanne Morin, Angela M Cheung, Stephanie Atkinson, Jacques P Brown, Sidney Feldman, David A Hanley, Anthony Hodsman, Sophie A Jamal, Stephanie M Kaiser, Brent Kvern, Kerry Siminoski, William D Leslie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 954 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 14 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 925 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 170 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 158 | 17% |
| Other | 92 | 10% |
| Researcher | 83 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 81 | 8% |
| Other | 198 | 21% |
| Unknown | 172 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 443 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 32 | 3% |
| Other | 116 | 12% |
| Unknown | 194 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#658,452
of 23,746,606 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,053
of 8,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,790
of 101,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,746,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.