| Title |
Retraction to: Nitrate use and changes in bone mineral density: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-016-3843-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. A. Jamal, D. Goltzman, D. A. Hanley, A. Papaioannou, J. C. Prior, R. G. Josse |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,475,313
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#400
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,733
of 416,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#12
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.