↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Association Between Change in BMD and Fragility Fracture in Women and Men1*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Association Between Change in BMD and Fragility Fracture in Women and Men1*
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, December 2009
DOI 10.1359/jbmr.081004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudie Berger, Lisa Langsetmo, Lawrence Joseph, David A Hanley, K Shawn Davison, Robert G Josse, Jerilynn C Prior, Nancy Kreiger, Alan Tenenhouse, David Goltzman

Abstract

Our objective was to estimate the relationship between longitudinal change in BMD and fragility fractures. We studied 3635 women and 1417 men 50-85 yr of age in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study who had at least two BMD measurements (lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and trochanter) within the first 5 yr of the study and fragility fractures (any, main, forearm/wrist, ribs, hip) within the first 7 yr. Multiple logistic regression was used to model the relationship between baseline BMD, BMD change, and fragility fractures. We found that, among nonusers of antiresorptives, independent of baseline BMD, a decrease of 0.01 g/cm(2)/yr in total hip BMD was associated with an increased risk of fragility fracture with ORs of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01; 1.32) in women and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.02; 1.78) in men. The risk of fragility fractures in subgroups such as fast losers and those with osteopenia was better estimated by models that included BMD change than by models that included baseline BMD but excluded BMD change. Although the association between baseline BMD and fragility fractures was similar in users and nonusers of antiresorptives, the association was stronger in nonusers compared with users. These results show that BMD change in both men and women is an independent risk factor for fragility fractures and also predicts fracture risk in those with osteopenia. The results suggest that BMD change should be included with other variables in a comprehensive fracture prediction model to capture its contribution to osteoporotic fracture risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Engineering 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,327,547
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#1,056
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,009
of 177,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#215
of 1,260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.