| Title |
Management of frailty: a protocol of a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-017-0522-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed M. Negm, Courtney C. Kennedy, Lehana Thabane, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Jonathan D. Adachi, Julie Richardson, Ian D. Cameron, Aidan Giangregorio, Alexandra Papaioannou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 75 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,862,595
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,794
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,669
of 329,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#40
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.