| Title |
Too Fit To Fracture: a consensus on future research priorities in osteoporosis and exercise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-014-2652-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. M. Giangregorio, N. J. MacIntyre, A. Heinonen, A. M. Cheung, J. D. Wark, K. Shipp, S. McGill, M. C. Ashe, J. Laprade, R. Jain, H. Keller, A. Papaioannou |
| Abstract |
An international consensus process identified the following research priorities in osteoporosis and exercise: study of exercise in high-risk cohorts, evaluation of multimodal interventions, research examining translation into practice and a goal to examine fracture outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,659,279
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#750
of 3,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,734
of 236,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#13
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.