| Title |
Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-010-1465-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L.-A. Fraser, L. Langsetmo, C. Berger, G. Ioannidis, D. Goltzman, J. D. Adachi, A. Papaioannou, R. Josse, C. S. Kovacs, W. P. Olszynski, T. Towheed, D. A. Hanley, S. M. Kaiser, J. Prior, S. Jamal, N. Kreiger, J. P. Brown, H. Johansson, A. Oden, E. McCloskey, J. A. Kanis, W. D. Leslie, CaMos Research Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 34% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,728,388
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#785
of 3,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,423
of 181,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.