↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Effect of Anticholinergic Medications on Falls, Fracture Risk, and Bone Mineral Density Over a 10-Year Period

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Pharmacotherapy, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Anticholinergic Medications on Falls, Fracture Risk, and Bone Mineral Density Over a 10-Year Period
Published in
Annals of Pharmacotherapy, May 2014
DOI 10.1177/1060028014535363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa-Ann Fraser, Jonathan D. Adachi, William D. Leslie, David Goltzman, Robert Josse, Jerilynn Prior, Stephanie Kaiser, Nancy Kreiger, Christopher S. Kovacs, Tassos P. Anastassiades, Alexandra Papaioannou, David Goltzman, Nancy Kreiger, Suzanne Godmaire, Silvia Dumont, Claudie Berger, Wei Zhou, Christopher Kovacs, Emma Sheppard, Susan Kirkland, Stephanie Kaiser, Barbara Stanfield, Jacques P. Brown, Louis Bessette, Marc Gendreau, Tassos Anastassiades, Tanveer Towheed, Barbara Matthews, Bob Josse, Sophie Jamal, Tim Murray, Barbara Gardner-Bray, Jonathan D. Adachi, Alexandra Papaioannou, Laura Pickard, P. Olszynski, K. Shawn Davison, Jola Thingvold, David A. Hanley, Jane Allan, Jerilynn C. Prior, Millan Patel, Yvette Vigna, Brian Lentle

Abstract

Many medications used in older adults have strong anticholinergic (ACH) properties, which may increase the risk of falls and fractures. Use of these medications was identified in a population-based Canadian cohort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 18%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,667,006
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Pharmacotherapy
#962
of 3,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,408
of 227,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Pharmacotherapy
#16
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.