↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Perceptions of a psychoeducation program for caregivers of persons with dementia at end of life: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Aging & Mental Health, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions of a psychoeducation program for caregivers of persons with dementia at end of life: a qualitative study
Published in
Aging & Mental Health, November 2017
DOI 10.1080/13607863.2017.1399347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela Durepos, Sharon Kaasalainen, Sandra Carroll, Alexandra Papaioannou

Abstract

Caregivers (CG) of persons with dementia have described positive and challenging experiences related to caring for a person with a neurological disease. This study explored perceived benefits and challenges of a unique psychoeducation program provided at end of life (EOL) jointly attended by current and bereaved CGs of persons with dementia, residing in a hospital Specialized Care Unit. Semi-structured interviews were held with sixteen participants and analyzed with content analysis. Program benefits were perceived by CGs such as: (i) enhanced emotional well-being, (ii) increased feelings of preparedness for EOL, and (iii) personal growth into role models. Within the organization the program was perceived as promoting relationship-centered care and increasing resources. Challenges such as diverse CG preferences, day-time scheduling and limited involvement of unit staff were perceived as barriers. This program fills a gap in care for CGs at the critical stage of EOL with continuity into bereavement. Implications for practice include: increasing engagement of unit staff for involvement and tailoring of the program, and translation of the program into alternative settings like long-term care. Policies outlining the support needs and resources for CGs through EOL within and outside the hospital are necessary to ensure access and continuity of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 36 27%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 36 27%
Psychology 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Aging & Mental Health
#1,290
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,117
of 342,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging & Mental Health
#47
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.