| Title |
The Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Pain Protocol in Long Term Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.05.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Kaasalainen, Kevin Brazil, Noori Akhtar-Danesh, Esther Coker, Jenny Ploeg, Faith Donald, Ruth Martin-Misener, Alba DiCenso, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, Lisa Dolovich, Alexandra Papaioannou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 21% |
| Psychology | 15 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#1,823
of 3,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,212
of 177,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.