↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Osteoporosis Prescribing in Long-Term Care: Impact of a Provincial Knowledge Translation Strategy*

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal on Aging, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Osteoporosis Prescribing in Long-Term Care: Impact of a Provincial Knowledge Translation Strategy*
Published in
Canadian Journal on Aging, April 2015
DOI 10.1017/s0714980815000057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Courtney C. Kennedy, George Ioannidis, Lehana Thabane, Jonathan D. Adachi, Denis O’Donnell, Lora M. Giangregorio, Laura E. Pickard, Alexandra Papaioannou

Abstract

This study described prescribing trends before and after implementing a provincial strategy aimed at improving osteoporosis and fracture prevention in Ontario long-term care (LTC) homes. Data were obtained from a pharmacy provider for 10 LTC homes in 2007 and 166 homes in 2012. We used weighted, multiple linear regression analyses to examine facility-level changes in vitamin D, calcium, and osteoporosis medication prescribing rates between 2007 and 2012. After five years, the estimated increase in vitamin D, calcium, and osteoporosis medication prescribing rates, respectively, was 38.2 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.0, 47.3; p < .001), 4.0 per cent (95% CI: -3.9, 12.0; p = .318), and 0.2 per cent (95% CI: -3.3, 3.7; p = .91). Although the study could not assess causality, findings suggest that wide-scale knowledge translation activities successfully improved vitamin D prescribing rates, although ongoing efforts are needed to target homes with low uptake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,241
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal on Aging
#250
of 557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,238
of 280,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal on Aging
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.