↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

The burden of osteoporotic fractures beyond acute care: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos)

Overview of attention for article published in Age & Ageing, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
The burden of osteoporotic fractures beyond acute care: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos)
Published in
Age & Ageing, July 2011
DOI 10.1093/ageing/afr085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Kaffashian, Parminder Raina, Mark Oremus, Laura Pickard, Jonathan Adachi, Emmanuel Papadimitropoulos, Alexandra Papaioannou

Abstract

the burden associated with osteoporotic fractures has commonly been reported in terms of utilisation of acute care. However, individuals with fractures suffer lasting deficits in quality of life and the burden of care extends well beyond the initial acute care period. The burden of fractures related to post-acute heath care utilisation, and informal care giving, has not been sufficiently addressed. We examine the use of formal and informal post-acute care in men and women 50 years and older who sustained fractures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,467,433
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#3,002
of 3,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,259
of 130,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#22
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.