↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Associations of protein intake and protein source with bone mineral density and fracture risk: A population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Associations of protein intake and protein source with bone mineral density and fracture risk: A population-based cohort study
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12603-015-0544-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Langsetmo, S.I. Barr, C. Berger, N. Kreiger, E. Rahme, J.D. Adachi, A. Papaioannou, S.M. Kaiser, J.C. Prior, D.A. Hanley, C.S. Kovacs, R.G. Josse, David Goltzman

Abstract

High dietary protein has been hypothesized to cause lower bone mineral density (BMD) and greater fracture risk. Previous results are conflicting and few studies have assessed potential differences related to differing protein sources. To determine associations between total protein intake, and protein intake by source (dairy, non-dairy animal, plant) with BMD, BMD change, and incident osteoporotic fracture. Prospective cohort study (Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study). Participants/Measures: Protein intake was assessed as percent of total energy intake (TEI) at Year 2 (1997-99) using a food frequency questionnaire (N=6510). Participants were contacted annually to ascertain incident fracture. Total hip and lumbar spine BMD was measured at baseline and Year 5. Analyses were stratified by group (men 25-49 y, men 50+ y, premenopausal women 25-49 y, and postmenopausal women 50+ y) and adjusted for major confounders. Fracture analyses were limited to those 50+ y. Intakes of dairy protein (with adjustment for BMI) were positively associated with total hip BMD among men and women aged 50+ y, and in men aged 25-49. Among adults aged 50+ y, those with protein intakes of <12% TEI (women) and <11% TEI (men) had increased fracture risk compared to those with intakes of 15% TEI. Fracture risk did not significantly change as intake increased above 15% TEI, and was not significantly associated with protein source. In contrast to hypothesized risk of high protein, we found that for adults 50+ y, low protein intake (below 15% TEI) may lead to increased fracture risk. Source of protein was a determinant of BMD, but not fracture risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 30 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,216,227
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#667
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,400
of 287,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.