↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Frailty Change and Major Osteoporotic Fracture in the Elderly: Data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women 3‐Year Hamilton Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Frailty Change and Major Osteoporotic Fracture in the Elderly: Data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women 3‐Year Hamilton Cohort
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/jbmr.2739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guowei Li, Alexandra Papaioannou, Lehana Thabane, Ji Cheng, Jonathan D Adachi

Abstract

Investigating the cumulative rate of deficits and the change of a frailty index (FI) chronologically is helpful in clinical and research settings in the elderly. However, limited evidence for the change of frailty before and after some nonfatal adverse health event such as a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) is available. Data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women 3-year Hamilton cohort were used in this study. The changes of FI before and after onset of MOF were compared between the women with and without incident MOF. We also evaluated the relationship between risk of MOF, falls and death and the change of FI and the absolute FI measures. There were 3,985 women included in this study (mean age: 69.4 years). The change of FI was significantly larger in the women with MOF than those without MOF at Year 1 (0.085 vs. 0.067, p-value = 0.036) and Year 2 (0.080 vs. 0.052, p-value = 0.042) post-baseline. The FI change was not significantly related with risk of MOF independently of age. However the absolute FI measures were significantly associated with increased risk of MOF, falls and death independently of age. In summary, the increase of the FI is significantly larger in the elderly women experiencing a MOF than their peer controls, indicating their worsening frailty and greater deficit accumulation after a MOF. Measures of the FI change may aid in the understanding of cumulative aging nature in the elderly and serve as an instrument for intervention planning and assessment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 25 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,178,698
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#3,633
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,800
of 298,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.