↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Condition-Specific Pamphlets to Improve End-of-life Communication in Long-term Care: Staff Perceptions on Usability and Use

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Condition-Specific Pamphlets to Improve End-of-life Communication in Long-term Care: Staff Perceptions on Usability and Use
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Sussman, Sharon Kaasalainen, Eunyoung Lee, Noori Akhtar-Danesh, Patricia H Strachan, Kevin Brazil, Robin Bonifas, Valérie Bourgeois-Guérin, Patrick Durivage, Alexandra Papaioannou, Laurel Young

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 43 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 45 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#681,223
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#119
of 3,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,247
of 443,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#4
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.