| Title |
A protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality (Health TAPESTRY) platform approach to promote person-focused primary healthcare for older adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-016-0407-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Dolovich, Doug Oliver, Larkin Lamarche, Gina Agarwal, Tracey Carr, David Chan, Laura Cleghorn, Lauren Griffith, Dena Javadi, Monika Kastner, Jennifer Longaphy, Dee Mangin, Alexandra Papaioannou, Jenny Ploeg, Parminder Raina, Julie Richardson, Cathy Risdon, P. Lina Santaguida, Sharon Straus, Lehana Thabane, Ruta Valaitis, David Price |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 275 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 16% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 78 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 11% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 87 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,041,169
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,091
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,094
of 318,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#37
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.