↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Non-hip, non-spine fractures drive healthcare utilization following a fracture: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW)

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Non-hip, non-spine fractures drive healthcare utilization following a fracture: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW)
Published in
Osteoporosis International, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00198-012-1968-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Ioannidis, J. Flahive, L. Pickard, A. Papaioannou, R. D. Chapurlat, K. G. Saag, S. Silverman, F. A. Anderson, S. H. Gehlbach, F. H. Hooven, S. Boonen, J. E. Compston, C. Cooper, A. Díez-Perez, S. L. Greenspan, A. Z. LaCroix, R. Lindsay, J. C. Netelenbos, J. Pfeilschifter, M. Rossini, C. Roux, P. N. Sambrook, E. S. Siris, N. B. Watts, J. D. Adachi, for the GLOW Investigators

Abstract

We evaluated healthcare utilization associated with treating fracture types in >51,000 women aged ≥55 years. Over the course of 1 year, there were five times more non-hip, non-spine fractures than hip or spine fractures, resulting in twice as many days of hospitalization and rehabilitation/nursing home care for non-hip, non-spine fractures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Professor 7 8%
Other 24 29%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,156,537
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,952
of 3,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,381
of 161,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.