↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Palliative Care Models in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review.

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian journal of nursing leadership, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Palliative Care Models in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review.
Published in
Canadian journal of nursing leadership, September 2019
DOI 10.12927/cjnl.2019.25975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Kaasalainen, Tamara Sussman, Lynn McCleary, Genevieve Thompson, Paulette V Hunter, Abigail Wickson-Griffiths, Rose Cook, Vanina Dal Bello-Haas, Lorraine Venturato, Alexandra Papaioannou, John You, Deborah Parker

Abstract

The goal of this scoping review was to identify existing palliative models in long-term care (LTC) homes and differentiate between the key components of each in terms of training/capacity-building strategies; resident, family and staff support; and advance care planning (ACP) and goals-of-care discussions. We conducted a scoping review based on established methods to summarize the international literature on palliative models and programs for LTC. We analyzed the data using tabular summaries and content analysis. We extracted data from 46 articles related to palliative programs, training/capacity building, family support, ACP and goals of care. Study results highlighted that three key components are needed in a palliative program in LTC: (1) training and capacity building; (2) support for residents, family and staff; and (3) ACP, goals-of-care discussion and informed consent. This scoping review provided important information about key components to be included in a palliative program in LTC. Future work is needed to develop a model that suits the unique characteristics in the Canadian context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 27 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 28 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,358,941
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Canadian journal of nursing leadership
#9
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,832
of 361,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian journal of nursing leadership
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them