↓ Skip to main content

McMaster University

Developing a Fracture Risk Clinical Assessment Protocol for Long-Term Care: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Developing a Fracture Risk Clinical Assessment Protocol for Long-Term Care: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin McArthur, Loretta Hillier, George Ioannidis, Jonathan D Adachi, Lora Giangregorio, John Hirdes, Alexandra Papaioannou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Unspecified 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 10 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,599,309
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#939
of 3,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,846
of 429,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#44
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.