You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patterns of tree species composition at watershed-scale in the Amazon ‘arc of deforestation’: implications for conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Conservation, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0376892916000278 |
Authors |
PAULO SÉRGIO MORANDI, BEATRIZ SCHWANTES MARIMON, PEDRO V. EISENLOHR, BEN HUR MARIMON-JUNIOR, CLAUDINEI OLIVEIRA-SANTOS, TED R. FELDPAUSCH, EDMAR ALMEIDA DE OLIVEIRA, SIMONE MATIAS REIS, JON LLOYD, OLIVER L. PHILLIPS |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 18 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,722
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Conservation
#699
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,520
of 365,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Conservation
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.