You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The number of tree species on Earth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2115329119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, Peter B Reich, Javier G P Gamarra, Tom Crowther, Cang Hui, Albert Morera, Jean-Francois Bastin, Sergio de-Miguel, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Jens-Christian Svenning, Josep M Serra-Diaz, Cory Merow, Brian Enquist, Maria Kamenetsky, Junho Lee, Jun Zhu, Jinyun Fang, Douglass F Jacobs, Bryan Pijanowski, Arindam Banerjee, Robert A Giaquinto, Giorgio Alberti, Angelica Maria Almeyda Zambrano, Esteban Alvarez-Davila, Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Valerio Avitabile, Gerardo A Aymard, Radomir Balazy, Chris Baraloto, Jorcely G Barroso, Meredith L Bastian, Philippe Birnbaum, Robert Bitariho, Jan Bogaert, Frans Bongers, Olivier Bouriaud, Pedro H S Brancalion, Francis Q Brearley, Eben North Broadbent, Filippo Bussotti, Wendeson Castro da Silva, Ricardo Gomes César, Goran Češljar, Víctor Chama Moscoso, Han Y H Chen, Emil Cienciala, Connie J Clark, David A Coomes, Selvadurai Dayanandan, Mathieu Decuyper, Laura E Dee, Jhon Del Aguila Pasquel, Géraldine Derroire, Marie Noel Kamdem Djuikouo, Tran Van Do, Jiri Dolezal, Ilija Đ Đorđević, Julien Engel, Tom M Fayle, Ted R Feldpausch, Jonas K Fridman, David J Harris, Andreas Hemp, Geerten Hengeveld, Bruno Herault, Martin Herold, Thomas Ibanez, Andrzej M Jagodzinski, Bogdan Jaroszewicz, Kathryn J Jeffery, Vivian Kvist Johannsen, Tommaso Jucker, Ahto Kangur, Victor N Karminov, Kuswata Kartawinata, Deborah K Kennard, Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas, Gunnar Keppel, Mohammed Latif Khan, Pramod Kumar Khare, Timothy J Kileen, Hyun Seok Kim, Henn Korjus, Amit Kumar, Ashwani Kumar, Diana Laarmann, Nicolas Labrière, Mait Lang, Simon L Lewis, Natalia Lukina, Brian S Maitner, Yadvinder Malhi, Andrew R Marshall, Olga V Martynenko, Abel L Monteagudo Mendoza, Petr V Ontikov, Edgar Ortiz-Malavasi, Nadir C Pallqui Camacho, Alain Paquette, Minjee Park, Narayanaswamy Parthasarathy, Pablo Luis Peri, Pascal Petronelli, Sebastian Pfautsch, Oliver L Phillips, Nicolas Picard, Daniel Piotto, Lourens Poorter, John R Poulsen, Hans Pretzsch, Hirma Ramírez-Angulo, Zorayda Restrepo Correa, Mirco Rodeghiero, Rocío Del Pilar Rojas Gonzáles, Samir G Rolim, Francesco Rovero, Ervan Rutishauser, Purabi Saikia, Christian Salas-Eljatib, Dmitry Schepaschenko, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen, Vladimír Šebeň, Marcos Silveira, Ferry Slik, Bonaventure Sonké, Alexandre F Souza, Krzysztof Jan Stereńczak, Miroslav Svoboda, Hermann Taedoumg, Nadja Tchebakova, John Terborgh, Elena Tikhonova, Armando Torres-Lezama, Fons van der Plas, Rodolfo Vásquez, Helder Viana, Alexander C Vibrans, Emilio Vilanova, Vincent A Vos, Hua-Feng Wang, Bertil Westerlund, Lee J T White, Susan K Wiser, Tomasz Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, Lise Zemagho, Zhi-Xin Zhu, Irié C Zo-Bi, Jingjing Liang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,410 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 122 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 57 | 4% |
| Spain | 44 | 3% |
| Mexico | 34 | 2% |
| Germany | 34 | 2% |
| Brazil | 33 | 2% |
| Canada | 32 | 2% |
| France | 30 | 2% |
| Colombia | 26 | 2% |
| Other | 372 | 26% |
| Unknown | 626 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1063 | 75% |
| Scientists | 312 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 29 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 526 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 526 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 105 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 17% |
| Unknown | 146 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 134 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 112 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Engineering | 19 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 56 | 11% |
| Unknown | 169 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3032. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,192
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#68
of 103,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 524,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4
of 935 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 935 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.