You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolutionary heritage influences Amazon tree ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2016.1587 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernanda Coelho de Souza, Kyle G. Dexter, Oliver L. Phillips, Roel J. W. Brienen, Jerome Chave, David R. Galbraith, Gabriela Lopez Gonzalez, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, R. Toby Pennington, Lourens Poorter, Miguel Alexiades, Esteban Álvarez-Dávila, Ana Andrade, Luis E. O. C. Aragão, Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Eric J. M. M. Arets, Gerardo A. Aymard C, Christopher Baraloto, Jorcely G. Barroso, Damien Bonal, Rene G. A. Boot, José L. C. Camargo, James A. Comiskey, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Plínio B. de Camargo, Anthony Di Fiore, Fernando Elias, Terry L. Erwin, Ted R. Feldpausch, Leandro Ferreira, Nikolaos M. Fyllas, Emanuel Gloor, Bruno Herault, Rafael Herrera, Niro Higuchi, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Timothy J. Killeen, William F. Laurance, Susan Laurance, Jon Lloyd, Thomas E. Lovejoy, Yadvinder Malhi, Leandro Maracahipes, Beatriz S. Marimon, Ben H. Marimon-Junior, Casimiro Mendoza, Paulo Morandi, David A. Neill, Percy Núñez Vargas, Edmar A. Oliveira, Eddie Lenza, Walter A. Palacios, Maria C. Peñuela-Mora, John J. Pipoly, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Adriana Prieto, Carlos A. Quesada, Hirma Ramirez-Angulo, Agustin Rudas, Kalle Ruokolainen, Rafael P. Salomão, Marcos Silveira, Juliana Stropp, Hans ter Steege, Raquel Thomas-Caesar, Peter van der Hout, Geertje M. F. van der Heijden, Peter J. van der Meer, Rodolfo V. Vasquez, Simone A. Vieira, Emilio Vilanova, Vincent A. Vos, Ophelia Wang, Kenneth R. Young, Roderick J. Zagt, Timothy R. Baker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 52 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,465,275
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,645
of 11,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,601
of 427,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#63
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.