↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, July 2015
DOI 10.1111/ddi.12357
Authors

Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Kyle G. Dexter, R. Toby Pennington, Jérôme Chave, Simon L. Lewis, Miguel N. Alexiades, Esteban Alvarez, Atila Alves de Oliveira, Iêda L. Amaral, Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami, Eric J. M. M. Arets, Gerardo A. Aymard, Christopher Baraloto, Damien Bonal, Roel Brienen, Carlos Cerón, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Anthony Di Fiore, William Farfan‐Rios, Ted R. Feldpausch, Niro Higuchi, Isau Huamantupa‐Chuquimaco, Susan G. Laurance, William F. Laurance, Gabriela López‐Gonzalez, Beatriz S. Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon‐Junior, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, David Neill, Walter Palacios Cuenca, Maria Cristina Peñuela Mora, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Adriana Prieto, Carlos A. Quesada, Hirma Ramirez Angulo, Agustín Rudas, Ademir R. Ruschel, Norma Salinas Revilla, Rafael P. Salomão, Ana Segalin de Andrade, Miles R. Silman, Wilson Spironello, Hans ter Steege, John Terborgh, Marisol Toledo, Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Ima C. G. Vieira, Emilio Vilanova Torre, Vincent Vos, Oliver L. Phillips

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 2%
Colombia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 272 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 16%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 57 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 47%
Environmental Science 48 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 3%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 71 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,202,180
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#685
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,548
of 275,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.