You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tree diversity and above-ground biomass in the South America Cerrado biome and their conservation implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-1589-8 |
| Authors |
Paulo S. Morandi, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon-Junior, James A. Ratter, Ted R. Feldpausch, Guarino Rinaldi Colli, Cássia Beatriz Rodrigues Munhoz, Manoel Cláudio da Silva Júnior, Edson de Souza Lima, Ricardo Flores Haidar, Luzmila Arroyo, Alejandro Araujo Murakami, Fabiana de Góis Aquino, Bruno Machado Teles Walter, José Felipe Ribeiro, Renata Françoso, Fernando Elias, Edmar Almeida de Oliveira, Simone Matias Reis, Bianca de Oliveira, Eder Carvalho das Neves, Denis Silva Nogueira, Herson Souza Lima, Tatiane Pires de Carvalho, Silvo Alves Rodrigues, Daniel Villarroel, Jeanine M. Felfili, Oliver L. Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 22% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Brazil | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Congo | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Scientists | 11 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 24% |
| Engineering | 10 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,693,917
of 24,833,004 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#228
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,376
of 335,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.