You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does the disturbance hypothesis explain the biomass increase in basin‐wide Amazon forest plot data?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01891.x |
| Authors |
M. GLOOR, O. L. PHILLIPS, J. J. LLOYD, S. L. LEWIS, Y. MALHI, T. R. BAKER, G. LÓPEZ‐GONZALEZ, J. PEACOCK, S. ALMEIDA, A. C. ALVES De OLIVEIRA, E. ALVAREZ, I. AMARAL, L. ARROYO, G. AYMARD, O. BANKI, L. BLANC, D. BONAL, P. BRANDO, K.‐J. CHAO, J. CHAVE, N. DÁVILA, T. ERWIN, J. SILVA, A. Di FIORE, T. R. FELDPAUSCH, A. FREITAS, R. HERRERA, N. HIGUCHI, E. HONORIO, E. JIMÉNEZ, T. KILLEEN, W. LAURANCE, C. MENDOZA, A. MONTEAGUDO, A. ANDRADE, D. NEILL, D. NEPSTAD, P. NÚÑEZ VARGAS, M. C. PEÑUELA, A. PEÑA CRUZ, A. PRIETO, N. PITMAN, C. QUESADA, R. SALOMÃO, MARCOS SILVEIRA, M. SCHWARZ, J. STROPP, F. RAMÍREZ, H. RAMÍREZ, A. RUDAS, H. Ter STEEGE, N. SILVA, A. TORRES, J. TERBORGH, R. VÁSQUEZ, G. Van Der HEIJDEN |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 16 | 5% |
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 282 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 74 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 73 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 99 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,180,565
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#4,745
of 6,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,484
of 96,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.