↓ Skip to main content

Drier tropical forests are susceptible to functional changes in response to a long‐term drought

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
57 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drier tropical forests are susceptible to functional changes in response to a long‐term drought
Published in
Ecology Letters, March 2019
DOI 10.1111/ele.13243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, Imma Oliveras, Sami Rifai, Sophie Fauset, Stephen Adu‐Bredu, Kofi Affum‐Baffoe, Timothy R. Baker, Ted R. Feldpausch, Agne Gvozdevaite, Wannes Hubau, Nathan J. B. Kraft, Simon L. Lewis, Sam Moore, Ülo Niinemets, Theresa Peprah, Oliver L. Phillips, Kasia Ziemińska, Brian Enquist, Yadvinder Malhi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 296 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 59 20%
Unknown 76 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 29%
Environmental Science 77 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 4%
Engineering 7 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 98 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#994,895
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#514
of 3,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,140
of 368,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#11
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.