You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Competition influences tree growth, but not mortality, across environmental gradients in Amazonia and tropical Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.3052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danaë M. A. Rozendaal, Oliver L. Phillips, Simon L. Lewis, Kofi Affum‐Baffoe, Esteban Alvarez-Davila, Ana Andrade, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami, Timothy R. Baker, Olaf Bánki, Roel J. W. Brienen, José Luis C. Camargo, James A. Comiskey, Marie Noël Djuikouo Kamdem, Sophie Fauset, Ted R. Feldpausch, Timothy J. Killeen, William F. Laurance, Susan G. W. Laurance, Thomas Lovejoy, Yadvinder Malhi, Beatriz S. Marimon, Ben‐Hur Marimon, Andrew R. Marshall, David A. Neill, Percy Núñez Vargas, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Lourens Poorter, Jan Reitsma, Marcos Silveira, Bonaventure Sonké, Terry Sunderland, Hermann Taedoumg, Hans ter Steege, John W. Terborgh, Ricardo K. Umetsu, Geertje M.F. van der Heijden, Emilio Vilanova, Vincent Vos, Lee J. T. White, Simon Willcock, Lise Zemagho, Mark C. Vanderwel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 72% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Researcher | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 53 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,879,102
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#863
of 6,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,147
of 414,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#12
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.