↓ Skip to main content

Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2338 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2819 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1600651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jernej Mlakar, Misa Korva, Nataša Tul, Mara Popović, Mateja Poljšak-Prijatelj, Jerica Mraz, Marko Kolenc, Katarina Resman Rus, Tina Vesnaver Vipotnik, Vesna Fabjan Vodušek, Alenka Vizjak, Jože Pižem, Miroslav Petrovec, Tatjana Avšič Županc

Abstract

A widespread epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was reported in 2015 in South and Central America and the Caribbean. A major concern associated with this infection is the apparent increased incidence of microcephaly in fetuses born to mothers infected with ZIKV. In this report, we describe the case of an expectant mother who had a febrile illness with rash at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy while she was living in Brazil. Ultrasonography performed at 29 weeks of gestation revealed microcephaly with calcifications in the fetal brain and placenta. After the mother requested termination of the pregnancy, a fetal autopsy was performed. Micrencephaly (an abnormally small brain) was observed, with almost complete agyria, hydrocephalus, and multifocal dystrophic calcifications in the cortex and subcortical white matter, with associated cortical displacement and mild focal inflammation. ZIKV was found in the fetal brain tissue on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay, with consistent findings on electron microscopy. The complete genome of ZIKV was recovered from the fetal brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,439 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,819 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 34 1%
United States 19 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 2731 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 551 20%
Student > Master 443 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 363 13%
Researcher 331 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 178 6%
Other 511 18%
Unknown 442 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 648 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 450 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 374 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 210 7%
Neuroscience 93 3%
Other 510 18%
Unknown 534 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2214. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,895
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#241
of 32,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33
of 412,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.