| Title |
Estimated US Infection- and Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Based on Blood Donations, July 2020-May 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2021.15161 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jefferson M. Jones, Mars Stone, Hasan Sulaeman, Rebecca V. Fink, Honey Dave, Matthew E. Levy, Clara Di Germanio, Valerie Green, Edward Notari, Paula Saa, Brad J. Biggerstaff, Donna Strauss, Debra Kessler, Ralph Vassallo, Rita Reik, Susan Rossmann, Mark Destree, Kim-Anh Nguyen, Merlyn Sayers, Chris Lough, Daniel W. Bougie, Megan Ritter, Gerardo Latoni, Billy Weales, Stacy Sime, Jed Gorlin, Nicole E. Brown, Carolyn V. Gould, Kevin Berney, Tina J. Benoit, Maureen J. Miller, Dane Freeman, Deeksha Kartik, Alicia M. Fry, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Aron J. Hall, Adam MacNeil, Adi V. Gundlapalli, Sridhar V. Basavaraju, Susan I. Gerber, Monica E. Patton, Brian Custer, Phillip Williamson, Graham Simmons, Natalie J. Thornburg, Steven Kleinman, Susan L. Stramer, Jean Opsomer, Michael P. Busch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,284 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 550 | 24% |
| Japan | 212 | 9% |
| Canada | 22 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | <1% |
| Germany | 14 | <1% |
| Australia | 13 | <1% |
| France | 11 | <1% |
| India | 11 | <1% |
| South Africa | 9 | <1% |
| Other | 108 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1319 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2063 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 98 | 4% |
| Scientists | 97 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 26 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1947. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,908
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#154
of 36,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218
of 440,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.