| Title |
Management Considerations in Infective Endocarditis: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2018.7596 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Wang, Jeffrey G. Gaca, Vivian H. Chu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 238 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 22% |
| Mexico | 17 | 7% |
| Spain | 13 | 5% |
| Colombia | 8 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 8 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 3% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Peru | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 183 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 14% |
| Scientists | 16 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 572 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 572 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 78 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 47 | 8% |
| Researcher | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 7% |
| Other | 115 | 20% |
| Unknown | 178 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 294 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 6% |
| Unknown | 199 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#297,130
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,715
of 36,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,327
of 342,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#74
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.