| Title |
COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jme-2022-108449 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin Bardosh, Allison Krug, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Trudo Lemmens, Salmaan Keshavjee, Vinay Prasad, Marty A Makary, Stefan Baral, Tracy Beth Høeg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35,553 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5619 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 2554 | 7% |
| Canada | 1004 | 3% |
| Australia | 351 | <1% |
| Brazil | 296 | <1% |
| France | 274 | <1% |
| Japan | 264 | <1% |
| Italy | 236 | <1% |
| Germany | 205 | <1% |
| Other | 2213 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22537 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33861 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 803 | 2% |
| Scientists | 573 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 279 | <1% |
| Unknown | 37 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13409. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#88
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 3,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 487,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.