| Title |
Mechanisms of poststroke fatigue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William De Doncker, Robert Dantzer, Heidi Ormstad, Annapoorna Kuppuswamy |
| Abstract |
Poststroke fatigue is a debilitating symptom and is poorly understood. Here we summarise molecular, behavioural and neurophysiological changes related to poststroke fatigue and put forward potential theories for mechanistic understanding of poststroke fatigue. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 42% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 66% |
| Scientists | 12 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 18 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,119,863
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#405
of 7,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,686
of 326,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#10
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.