↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Motor Skill Learning but Not Generalization in Chronic Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Motor Skill Learning but Not Generalization in Chronic Stroke
Published in
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, April 2018
DOI 10.1177/1545968318769164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Hamoudi, Heidi M. Schambra, Brita Fritsch, Annika Schoechlin-Marx, Cornelius Weiller, Leonardo G. Cohen, Janine Reis

Abstract

Motor training alone or combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) positioned over the motor cortex (M1) improves motor function in chronic stroke. Currently, understanding of how tDCS influences the process of motor skill learning after stroke is lacking. To assess the effects of tDCS on the stages of motor skill learning and on generalization to untrained motor function. In this randomized, sham-controlled, blinded study of 56 mildly impaired chronic stroke patients, tDCS (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode on the contralesional forehead) was applied during 5 days of training on an unfamiliar, challenging fine motor skill task (sequential visual isometric pinch force task). We assessed online and offline learning during the training period and retention over the following 4 months. We additionally assessed the generalization to untrained tasks. With training alone (sham tDCS group), patients acquired a novel motor skill. This skill improved online, remained stable during the offline periods and was largely retained at follow-up. When tDCS was added to training (real tDCS group), motor skill significantly increased relative to sham, mostly in the online stage. Long-term retention was not affected by tDCS. Training effects generalized to untrained tasks, but those performance gains were not enhanced further by tDCS. Training of an unfamiliar skill task represents a strategy to improve fine motor function in chronic stroke. tDCS augments motor skill learning, but its additive effect is restricted to the trained skill.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 65 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Psychology 9 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 72 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,380,237
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#135
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,441
of 326,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.