| Title |
‘Allocation concealment’: the evolution and adoption of a methodological term
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0141076818776604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth F Schulz, I Chalmers, DG Altman, DA Grimes, D Moher, RJ Hayes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,850,163
of 23,947,846 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#1,010
of 2,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,939
of 332,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.