| Title |
Central Sensitization: Explanation or Phenomenon?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychological Science, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2167702618781804 |
| Authors |
Emanuel N. van den Broeke, Diana M. Torta, Omer Van den Bergh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| Belgium | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 77% |
| Scientists | 7 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Psychology | 7 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,058,619
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#168
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,463
of 341,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.