↓ Skip to main content

SAGE Publishing

Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Hospitalization Intensity and Readmissions

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Care Research and Review, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Hospitalization Intensity and Readmissions
Published in
Medical Care Research and Review, March 2017
DOI 10.1177/1077558717692103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Mosher Henke, Zeynal Karaca, Teresa B. Gibson, Eli Cutler, Marguerite L. Barrett, Katharine Levit, Jayne Johann, Lauren Hersch Nicholas, Herbert S. Wong

Abstract

Medicare Advantage plans have incentives and tools to optimize patient care. Therefore, Medicare Advantage hospitalizations may have lower cost and higher quality than similar traditional Medicare hospitalizations. We applied a coarsened matching approach to 2013 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project hospital discharge data from 22 states to compare hospital cost, length of stay, and readmissions for Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. We found that Medicare Advantage hospitalizations were substantially less expensive and shorter for mental health stays but costlier and longer for injury and surgical stays. We found little difference in the cost and length of medical stays and in readmission rates. One explanation is that Medicare Advantage plans use outpatient settings for many patients with behavioral health conditions and for injury and surgical patients with less complex health needs. Alternatively, the observed differences in behavioral health cost and length of stay may represent skimping on appropriate care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,462,469
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Medical Care Research and Review
#155
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,914
of 308,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Care Research and Review
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.