You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Food Is Medicine” Strategies for Nutrition Security and Cardiometabolic Health Equity JACC State-of-the-Art Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dariush Mozaffarian, Karen E. Aspry, Kathryn Garfield, Penny Kris-Etherton, Hilary Seligman, Gladys P. Velarde, Kim Williams, Eugene Yang, ACC Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Section Nutrition and Lifestyle Working Group and Disparities of Care Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 157 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 29% |
| Argentina | 11 | 7% |
| Spain | 8 | 5% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 103 | 66% |
| Scientists | 26 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#452,883
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,098
of 16,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,715
of 350,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#20
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.