↓ Skip to main content

Acute Immune Signatures and Their Legacies in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Infected Cancer Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
92 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute Immune Signatures and Their Legacies in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Infected Cancer Patients
Published in
Cancer Cell, January 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sultan Abdul-Jawad, Luca Baù, Thanussuyah Alaguthurai, Irene Del Molino Del Barrio, Adam G Laing, Thomas S Hayday, Leticia Monin, Miguel Muñoz-Ruiz, Louisa McDonald, Isaac Francos Quijorna, Duncan McKenzie, Richard Davis, Anna Lorenc, Julie Nuo En Chan, Sarah Ryan, Eva Bugallo-Blanco, Rozalyn Yorke, Shraddha Kamdar, Matthew Fish, Iva Zlatareva, Pierre Vantourout, Aislinn Jennings, Sarah Gee, Katie Doores, Katharine Bailey, Sophie Hazell, Julien De Naurois, Charlotte Moss, Beth Russell, Aadil A Khan, Mark Rowley, Reuben Benjamin, Deborah Enting, Doraid Alrifai, Yin Wu, You Zhou, Paul Barber, Tony Ng, James Spicer, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Mayur Kumar, Jennifer Vidler, Yadanar Lwin, Paul Fields, Sophia N Karagiannis, Anthony C C Coolen, Anne Rigg, Sophie Papa, Adrian C Hayday, Piers E M Patten, Sheeba Irshad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Master 14 8%
Other 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 70 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 75 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#287,239
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#137
of 3,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,320
of 523,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#7
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.