↓ Skip to main content

European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Anterior chest wall resection and reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer.

Overview of attention for article published in Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 103)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Anterior chest wall resection and reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer.
Published in
Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, September 2015
DOI 10.1093/mmcts/mmv025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hide Elfrida Wee, Fazuludeen Ali Akbar, Keerthi Rajapaksha, Dokev Basheer Ahmed Aneez

Abstract

With breast cancer awareness, the incidence of large invasive tumours is rare. We present a video of locally advanced breast cancer invading the anterior chest wall requiring en bloc resection that resulted in a large chest wall defect with exposed pleural and pericardial surface. Skeletal reconstruction and provision of adequate soft tissue coverage in order to avoid respiratory failure was challenging. A 58-year-old female presented with a 3-year history of locally invasive breast carcinoma with contiguous spread to sternum, clavicles, sternoclavicular joints and bilateral second to fifth ribs. She underwent total sternectomy, bilateral second to fifth ribs and chest wall resection resulting in a 21 × 18 cm chest wall defect. Reconstruction of her sternum was with methyl-methacrylate cement prosthesis. Ribs were reconstructed with titanium plates. Soft tissue coverage was achieved with left vertical rectus abdominis pedicle flap, right external oblique transposition flap and a right latissimus dorsi free flap. Flap failure necessitated a right vastus lateralis free flap. She was discharged ambulant without respiratory compromise. Resection and reconstruction of large chest wall defects is possible due to new bioprosthetic materials and is possible with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 24%
Librarian 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 53%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#13,371,944
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#30
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,176
of 267,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.