↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability of a brief computerized intervention targeting anxiety sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptability of a brief computerized intervention targeting anxiety sensitivity
Published in
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, October 2016
DOI 10.1080/16506073.2016.1232748
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole A. Short, Kelly Fuller, Aaron M. Norr, Norman B. Schmidt

Abstract

Despite the well-documented efficacy of cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders, the acceptability of these treatments remains an under-researched area. A better understanding of acceptability could help to improve the initiation of, and engagement in, these effective interventions. Recent research has suggested computerized interventions of anxiety-related risk factors may be one way to improve acceptability and overcome several common barriers to treatment. Considering this, the current study tested the acceptability of a computerized, anxiety sensitivity (AS)-focused treatment among a sample of treatment-seeking community participants and military veterans (N = 58). Results indicated that the majority of participants rated the intervention as acceptable, and that drop-out rate was low (ie 5%). Moreover, higher acceptability scores were associated with older age, veteran status, lower income levels, African-American race, and being separated/divorced. Findings suggest that a computerized AS-focused treatment may be an acceptable treatment method, and may have advantages in acceptability for hard to reach populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 22 34%