You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accounting for Diversity in Suicide Research: Sampling and Sample Reporting Practices in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/sltb.12344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine B. Cha, Katherine M. Tezanos, Olivia M. Peros, Mei Yi Ng, Jessica D. Ribeiro, Matthew K. Nock, Joseph C. Franklin |
| Abstract |
Research on suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) has identified many risk factors, but whether these findings generalize to diverse populations remains unclear. We review longitudinal studies on STB risk factors over the past 50 years in the United States and evaluate the methodological practices of sampling and reporting sample characteristics. We found that articles frequently reported participant age and sex, less frequently reported participant race and ethnicity, and rarely reported participant veteran status or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender status. Sample reporting practices modestly and inconsistently improved over time. Finally, articles predominantly featured White, non-Hispanic, young adult samples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Australia | 3 | 27% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,722,793
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior
#169
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,916
of 321,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.