You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Overarousal as a mechanism of the relation between rumination and suicidality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychiatric Research, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.03.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan L. Rogers, Matthew E. Schneider, Raymond P. Tucker, Keyne C. Law, Michael D. Anestis, Thomas E. Joiner |
| Abstract |
Rumination, particularly brooding, is associated with suicidal ideation and attempts; however, mechanisms of these associations have not been identified. The present study examined manifestations of overarousal-agitation, insomnia, and nightmares-that have been linked to both rumination and suicide as indirect indicators of the link between brooding and suicidal ideation/attempts. A sample of 492 psychiatric outpatients (64.2% female), aged 17-65 years (M = 26.75, SD = 10.32), completed self-report measures before their intake appointments with a therapist. Results indicated that agitation and nightmares, but not insomnia, each significantly explained the association between brooding and suicidal ideation and between brooding and the presence of a past suicide attempt. Overall, these findings provide evidence that certain types of overarousal may serve as a mechanism of the association between brooding and suicidal ideation and attempts. Clinical implications, limitations, and future research directions are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2017.
All research outputs
#22,777,327
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#3,474
of 3,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,075
of 323,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#56
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.