You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Military personnel compared to multiple suicide attempters: Interpersonal theory of suicide constructs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Death Studies, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1080/07481187.2017.1334013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brittney L. Assavedo, Bradley A. Green, Michael D. Anestis |
| Abstract |
The current study aimed to address the discrepancy between suicide rates in the military and general population by comparing facets of the interpersonal theory of suicide between civilians with multiple suicide attempts and US military personnel. Military personnel exhibited higher levels of capability for suicide but lower levels of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness than civilian multiple attempters. When comparing only personnel endorsing ideation and civilian multiple attempters, the significant difference for capability remained, but the differences for perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness became non-significant. Results suggest the emergence of ideation places personnel at a greater risk for suicide than many civilian multiple attempters. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,799,012
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Death Studies
#246
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,349
of 313,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Death Studies
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.